Showing posts with label poli sci. Show all posts
Showing posts with label poli sci. Show all posts

Wednesday, January 20, 2010

A new reset button

The Obama administration presented the Russians with a "reset button" to denote departure from the diplomacy of the previous administration.

On Tuesday, the people of Massachusetts gave President Obama a reset button for domestic politics.

Evan Bayh saw it coming:
“The only we are able to govern successfully in this country is by liberals and progressives making common cause with independents and moderates,” Bayh said.  “Whenever you have just the furthest left elements of the Dem party attempting to impose their will on the rest of the country -- that’s not going to work too well.”
In point of fact, beginning with the Porkulus package, Congress has been run by a liberal faction of the Democratic Party.  That faction pushed its agenda with Gingrich-style party discipline and "Let's Make a Deal!" persuasion for those not part of the camp.

The reset button dictates that Obama and the Democrats will need to build broader coalitions of support for their agenda.  That means either better bribes or a more centrist direction--hopefully the latter.  The 2012 elections portend another significant reset.

Coakley concedes to Brown in Massachusetts Senate race: What does it mean for Obama?

Knowing a tiny bit about political science plus a wee bit of history, I tried my hand last January at evaluating President Obama's prospects based on his early agenda.  The president's push for health care reform had not yet occurred, but I can still claim to have done fairly well with relatively broad predictions.  I forecast that Obama's two initial priorities, economic stimulus and the closure of the Gitmo detention facility, carried substantial political risk:
Obama moved center with his proposal for economic stimulus. That was a good move. Unfortunately for the president, the Democrats in Congress have been less inclined to move center and the resulting bill (from the House, anyway) is much more partisan in character than the one Obama recommended. If the Senate increases the tax cut percentage reasonably close to his original proposal then a bipartisan bill may yet emerge. Obama gets a boost from that. Alternatively, the budget fight will help polarize conditions in the capital. The resulting bill will represent only the Democrats, and its relative lack of stimulative effect may come back to bite the party of the left.
I love it when circumstances occur that make it look like I know what I'm talking about.

My evaluation of the other issue panned out fairly well, also, if I can claim Eric Holder's decision to try some foreign terrorists in civil courts, along with Obama's other related judicial problems with terrorists, within its bounds:
Obama decided to bite the bullet and commit to closing Gitmo. The move is a sop to his base but a difficult one to pull off to the satisfaction of the electorate generally. In recognition of the difficulty, Obama fashioned his strategy by putting the resolution of the issue on a year-long timetable without any initial details.

As noted above, making this a key early issue carries substantial risk in terms of exercising his political power over time.
With the election of Scott Brown to the Senate, the political game in Washington changes.  Where Obama formerly could let liberal Democrats in Congress fashion and pass legislation agreeable to him, he will now be forced to seek a slightly broader coalition while enduring a rebuke of his policy course.

Obama might have averted the current problem if he had taken his own campaign rhetoric more seriously.  A more centrist stimulus bill with fewer pet projects stuffed inside would have diminished the GOP position as a clear alternative and, perhaps more importantly, jibed with the campaign rhetoric that so many independent voters found appealing.

Byron York had it right with regard to Brown's win in Massachusetts.  Independents and many Democrats do not like the health care reform bill, and neither do they like the way they see business conducted in  Washington.