The Obama campaign is running an ad claiming that Mitt Romney pays a lower tax rate than that of the average American. Following the ad’s release, PolitiFact published an article rating it as “Half-True.” From the article:Siggins links to an analysis from "Just Facts," a not-for-profit independent fact checker:
There are two main ways to make this calculation, and they lead to opposite conclusions. While we believe that including payroll taxes in the calculation offers a more accurate picture of what the American public pays the IRS, it’s also true that the Obama ad didn’t specify which measurement it was using, and in fact used a figure for Romney — 14 percent — that was based on income taxes alone. On balance, then, we rate the claim Half True.Unfortunately for PolitiFact, their analysis completely misses the boat.
Specifically, CBO found that households in the middle 20% of the U.S. income distribution paid an effective federal tax rate of 11.1% in 2009. Using CBO’s new estimate for allocating the burden of corporate income taxes, Just Facts and Ceterus calculate that Romney’s federal tax rate was 23.3% in 2010, which is twice the middle-income tax rate in 2009.
I criticized PolitiFact along the same lines on Aug. 10, but Siggins takes note of something I missed:
(T)he PolitiFact analysis ignores data cited by its own resource. The article cites the Tax Policy Center to look at what tax levels are at for all income quintiles. However, PolitiFact fails to note that the Center’s chart (the same one cited in the article) shows that the top 1% (which Romney definitely falls into) pay 7.7% of their income into the corporate tax structure.So the PolitiFact researcher, Louis Jacobson, had the information staring him in the face and missed it or ignored it. That's on top of somehow missing the CBO studies on effective tax rates.
Correction Aug. 15, 2012: Apologies to Dustin Siggins for consistently finding ways to put the vowel "a" in his name where it doesn't belong.