The idea of Medicare as a money-saving program may seem hard to grasp. After all, hasn’t Medicare spending risen dramatically over time? Yes, it has: adjusting for overall inflation, Medicare spending per beneficiary rose more than 400 percent from 1969 to 2009.Medicare pays health care providers rates that fall under the market price. As a result, the market price must increase to make up the difference. Private insurers carry the bulk of that burden. If Krugman doesn't realize this then he's no economist. If he does realize it and still writes this garbage then he's a hack.
But inflation-adjusted premiums on private health insurance rose more than 700 percent over the same period. So while it’s true that Medicare has done an inadequate job of controlling costs, the private sector has done much worse. And if we deny Medicare to 65- and 66-year-olds, we’ll be forcing them to get private insurance — if they can — that will cost much more than it would have cost to provide the same coverage through Medicare.
Opinions and analysis regarding politics, religion, sports, popular culture and life in general, expressed with my own humble brand of hubris
Monday, June 13, 2011
More Krugman hackery
It's almost as though economist and partisan hack Paul Krugman doesn't realize that private insurance subsidizes Medicare:
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment
Please remain on topic and keep coarse language to an absolute minimum. Comments in a language other than English will be assumed off topic.