Bear in mind that casualty figures might receive an upward adjustment if November casualties turn up in December. Usually such adjustments are minor, so it appears that this category of deaths dipped by approximately 100.(icasualties.org)
Nov-07 560 Oct-07 679 Sep-07 848 Aug-07 1,674 Jul-07 1,690 Jun-07 1,345 May-07 1,980
U.S. military deaths, by staying about the same as for October, were on track to be at their lowest for a two-month period since Feb-Mar of 2004:
It's worth noting that Iraq Body Count shows a much higher total for November, and it's somewhat more difficult to see trends in the IBC numbers than for icasualties.org.(icasualties.org)
2003 0 0 65 74 37 30 48 35 31 44 82 40 2004 47 20 52 135 80 42 54 66 80 64 137 72 2005 107 58 35 52 80 78 54 85 49 96 84 68 2006 62 55 31 76 69 61 43 65 72 106 70 112 2007 83 81 81 104 126 101 78 84 65 38 37
NOVEMBER TOTAL: 1,100 CIVILIANS KILLEDAnd in other news ...
(Iraq Body Count)
A Democrat congressman who once led criticism of the Iraq war now admits President Bush's change of strategy has improved security.Murtha went on to reiterate his call for a U.S. troop withdrawal.
(...)
Fresh from a four-day visit to Iraq and Kuwait, John Murtha said: "I think the 'surge' is working."
(TelegraphUK)
Democrats in Congress now look beyond pathetic. President Bush's change in strategy worked in spite of the initial charges that it would not. Gen. Petraeus was correct about reductions in violence despite comments such as that of Sen. Clinton that Petraeus' report requires "a willing suspension of disbelief" (Senatese for "Liar, liar, pants on fire!").
And now the Dems are apparently desperate to put their stamp on troop reductions to make sure the anti-war faction on the left gives credit where the Democrats want it.
*****
No comments:
Post a Comment
Please remain on topic and keep coarse language to an absolute minimum. Comments in a language other than English will be assumed off topic.