That type of story seems like the type that would automatically trigger skepticism from the American left. I would imagine that it would stimulate complaints such as "Bush pressured Maliki" or "Maliki is just a U.S. puppet"--and such a complaint would be plausible on its face if perhaps a bit exaggerated. Certainly the U.S. would be expected to diplomatically pressure Iraq to do the agreement our way--that is, the way of the Bush administration. Backtracking by al-Maliki under such pressure is not an outlandish expectation.
I don't think we have all the facts in yet, however. Here's how the news on the agreement is reported in Iraq (via Aswat Aliraq):
The "timetabled withdrawal" appears to agree with the supposedly misreported remarks from al-Maliki. On the other hand, there exists at least some doubt as to what conditions apply to the timetable. Is it based on dates or on situational measurables?BAGHDAD, July 14 (VOI) – Iraq and the United States have agreed on most points of the joint cooperation agreement, which is scheduled to govern the presence of U.S. troops in Iraq, a Shiite Unified Iraqi Coalition leader said on Monday.
"Disagreement between the Iraqi and U.S. sides has largely subsided and they have agreed on many points," Hassan al-Saneed told Aswat al-Iraq- Voices of Iraq- (VOI).
According to al-Saneed, the Iraqi vision of the security agreement with Washington can be divided into three aspects: cultural, economic and educational strategic cooperation, a timetabled withdrawal of the Multi-National Force (MNF), and military operations' go-ahead and coordination with the Iraqi government."Fighting terrorism will entail joint operations and coordination with the Iraqi government…," Saneed noted.
Time will tell and in the meantime I won't speculate as to which set of criteria will apply.
No comments:
Post a Comment
Please remain on topic and keep coarse language to an absolute minimum. Comments in a language other than English will be assumed off topic.